首页> 外文OA文献 >Effect of the C-factor and Dentin Preparation Method in the Bond Strength of a Mild Self-etch Adhesive
【2h】

Effect of the C-factor and Dentin Preparation Method in the Bond Strength of a Mild Self-etch Adhesive

机译:C因子和牙本质制备方法对温和自酸蚀粘合剂粘接强度的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study evaluated the effect of the C-factor and dentin preparation method (DPM) in the bond strength (BS) of a mild self-etch adhesive; the study also observed the SEM superficial aspects of the corresponding smear layer. For purposes of this study, 25 molars (n=5) were used in a bond strength test. The molars were divided into two parts (buccal and lingual): one part received a Class V cavity (C-factor=3) and the other received a flat surface (C-factor=0) with the same bur type (coarse diamond or carbide bur and fine diamond or carbide bur), both within the same dentin depth. Five teeth were prepared with wet 60-grit and 600-grit SiC papers. After restoration with Clearfil SE Bond, microtensile beans (0.8 mm(2)) were prepared and tested after 24 hours in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/minute). An additional two teeth for each DPM were prepared for SEM evaluation of the smear layer superficial aspects. The BS values were submitted to one-way ANOVA, considering only the DPM (flat surfaces) and two-way ANOVA (C-Factor x DPM, considering only burs) with p=0.05. Although the DPM in the flat surfaces was not significant, the standard deviations of carbide bur-prepared specimens were markedly lower. The BS was significantly lower in cavities. The fine carbide bur presented the most favorable smear layer aspect. It was concluded that different dentin preparation methods could not prevent the adverse effect in bond strength of a high C-factor. A coarse cut carbide bur should be avoided prior to a mild self-etch adhesive, because it adversely affected bond strength. In contrast, a fine cut carbide bur provided the best combination: high bond strength with low variability, which suggests a more reliable bond strength performance.
机译:这项研究评估了C因子和牙本质的制备方法(DPM)对温和的自蚀刻胶粘剂的粘合强度(BS)的影响。研究还观察了相应涂片层的SEM表面现象。为了本研究的目的,在结合强度测试中使用了25摩尔(n = 5)。磨牙分为两部分(颊和舌):一部分接受V级腔(C因子= 3),另一部分接受具有相同bur类型(粗糙的钻石或牙齿)的平坦表面(C因子= 0)。硬质合金钻头和细金刚石或硬质合金钻头),都在相同的牙本质深度内。用湿的60粒度和600粒度SiC纸制备五颗牙齿。用Clearfil SE Bond修复后,准备了微张力豆(0.8 mm(2)),并在24小时后在通用测试机(0.5 mm /分钟)中进行了测试。为每个DPM准备了另外两个牙齿,用于对涂片层表面方面进行SEM评估。 BS值提交给单向ANOVA,仅考虑DPM(平坦表面)和双向ANOVA(C因素x DPM,仅考虑毛边),p = 0.05。尽管在平坦表面上的DPM并不显着,但硬质合金钻头制备的样品的标准偏差明显较低。 BS的腔体明显降低。细硬质合金钻头表现出最有利的涂污层外观。结论是,不同的牙本质制备方法不能防止高C因子对键强度的不利影响。在使用温和的自蚀刻粘合剂之前,应避免使用粗大的硬质合金车针,因为它会对粘结强度产生不利影响。相反,细切硬质合金钻头提供了最佳组合:高粘结强度和低变异性,这表明粘结强度性能更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号